Monday, May 19, 2014

War and Peace

That is the title of the most recent fascinating issue of the publication “Inquiring Mind” (vol 30 (2) Spring 2014).   

Very controversial topic for a Buddhist publication!

Very well written articles.  Everyone should subscribe who is interested in consciousness.  You don’t have to be Buddhist to appreciate the interviews, discussions, contemplations, and artwork. 

As a peaceful warrior, I particularly resonated with these discussions.

Being the designated heretic, I have some comments. 

Also, at the beginning of this blog I did promise to discuss sex, drugs, guns, and rock n’ roll! 

We’ve discussed sex and drugs. 

Guns and liberals don’t usually “go together.”  I’ve done Karate since age 17, trained in the use of all sorts of weapons.  Best book for this discussion is the book “Gun Guys.”  That probably best reflects my own interest in high-level target shooting.  Read it, then we’ll talk.   http://www.danbaum.com/Nine_Lives/About_Gun_Guys.html

As an aside, I resonate the most with my training in Aikido, truly a non-aggressive martial art. 

Let us start at the end. 

War will exist as long as there are people who consider “others” to be less than human. 

You usually do not kill people who are in your family, unless, you are drunk or under the influence of other drugs.  However, drugs are a topic for another day. 

So, the higher you are on the evolutionary scale, the less likely you are to be able to kill another. 

Because there is no “other.” 

Everyone is in your family.  Everybody is yourself! 

Back to the fascinating articles.  Ann Wright resigned from the US State Department influenced by Buddhist teachings.  Yet, she still says:  “I think there are some specific situations in which military force may be the only way to stop violence” (p 9).    

Jon Kabat-Zinn was interviewed for what I think is the central issue (p 14). 

Jon stripped religion out of Vipassana Buddhist meditation and created a program for mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) acceptable to the medical system and to more of the general public.

Elizabeth Stanley wanted Jon to help teach mindfulness to soldiers.  Jon was reluctant at first.  Then relented. 

The idea is to protect soldiers from PTSD, and to increase their mindfulness.  To interact better with civilian populations.  To be more aware when they are pulling the trigger.  Perhaps preventing civilian deaths. 

Good articles and discussions.  No easy answers. 

How do you reconcile Buddha, Dharma, and Sangha with war? 

Non-harming? 

Of course, what we really need is for those who send soldiers to war, the administration, to be higher on the scale of consciousness.  Then they would be less likely to send these poor children to unnecessary wars. 

This begs the question, “is any war necessary?”

Teaching mindfulness is a good thing.  Training healthier minds is worthwhile. 

But, do not fool yourself into thinking that you are not creating a better soldier. 

They will be better at killing. 

More efficient, more accurate, perhaps less “friendly fire.” 

You are not automatically creating a peacenik.  

Well, some of those who develop a high enough level of consciousness may not be able to kill, and they will leave the service. 

Perhaps you are more likely to create a more “peaceful warrior.”    

Remember, the Samurai had high levels of conscious control over their emotions and actions. 

There have always been monk-warriors. 

I agree.  You will have less PTSD and less unethical behavior.  There will be less suffering for the soldiers, their families, and the civilians around them. 

If there are wolves, then you may need sheepdogs. 

But, remember, sheepdogs have sharp teeth and look a lot like wolves.  That makes sheep nervous.    

Perhaps the qualities of mindful awareness and emotional control developed through meditation practice will help prevent sheepdogs from degenerating into wolves. 

The movie “Demolition Man” has some good lessons. 

When everyone is peaceful, you do not need soldiers. 

When you need a soldier, create the best, and most mindful. 

And, most importantly, only send them to war under the most just of circumstances. 

If any war can be considered “just.” 

Namaste. 



No comments:

Post a Comment